13 August 2005

"We have seen it doesn't work..."



Here's a man who knows a bastard when when he smells one...

--ryan



Schroeder Plays the Iran Card
By Ray Furlong
BBC News, Hanover, Germany

German Chancellor Gerhard Schroeder has told an election campaign rally that the military option for resolving the dispute over Iran's nuclear programme should be "taken off the table".

"We're all concerned about the developments in Iran," he said.

"We don't want nuclear weapons to proliferate further."

But Mr Schroeder said diplomacy was the answer.

"I've read that military options are also on the table," he said.

"My answer to that is: 'Dear friends in Europe and America, let's develop a strong negotiating position towards Iran, but take the military option off the table'."

His words may cause irritation in Washington, where President George W Bush has just said he does not rule out the use of force in dealing with Iran.

Mr Schroeder's speech will also revive memories of the last election campaign three years ago, when he strongly opposed the idea of attacking Iraq.

Then, as now, his Social Democratic Party (SPD) was far behind in the opinion polls, and the position on Iraq is generally believed to have been a factor in helping him win the election.

Schroeder confident

It is too early to judge whether Iran can help revive Mr Schroeder's fortunes in a similar way, but his remarks drew rapturous applause and whoops of support from the several thousand-strong crowd gathered by the Hanover Opera House.

"He made it clear Germany won't take part in any military action. This is just the policy I would hope for from a German perspective," said one man who identified himself as an SPD supporter.

His neighbour said he had not yet decided who to vote for, but that he agreed with Mr Schroeder's remarks. "They were very, very good. They should be the guidelines for international policy on this case," he said.

"I don't know what the conservative view on this is."

Mr Schroeder also focused on domestic policy in his speech, savagely criticising the opposition conservatives, the CDU/CSU, and pledging to maintain Germany's welfare state.

Issues like this may be decisive in the election.

Years of near-zero growth and an unemployment rate that topped five million people - 12% - earlier this year, have made the SPD-led government unpopular.

Mr Schroeder has been relaxed and confident in recent weeks, and his party has narrowed the CDU/CSU's lead.

'An act'

Gero Neugebauer, a political scientist at the Free University in Berlin, says it is at least partly an act.

"It's a difficult job for him - on the one hand knowing he won't return to the chancellor's office, and on the other obliged to save the Social Democrats," he said.

"So he can't be as relaxed as he pretends. But Chancellor Schroeder is a very good actor. He's playing a better game than Angela Merkel."

Mrs Merkel, the CDU leader, is still widely expected to be the next chancellor, but her campaign has been beset by setbacks.

First, she herself confused the terms "net" and "gross" in two television interviews, damaging her claim to greater economic competence than the government.

Then the CSU leader, Edmund Stoiber, added to her troubles in speeches where he made disparaging remarks about "frustrated East Germans".

Mr Stoiber was complaining that in the former communist East there is high support for a new left-wing alliance made up of reformed communists and disaffected social democrats.

"It's a pity people in other parts of the country are not as clever as in Bavaria" he said, referring to his own regional stronghold.

The remarks, widely seen as "Ossie-bashing", caused a storm of indignation, and are expected to cost the CDU dear in eastern Germany.

Mrs Merkel, herself from the east, said the comments were "counterproductive" and that she wanted to be a chancellor for all Germans.

When she officially launched her campaign last week she made it clear she wanted to focus on different issues.

"I find it depressing that we have nearly five million unemployed," she said.

"In the 1998 election campaign the current chancellor said he wanted to be judged on this issue alone.

"If he didn't reduce unemployment he didn't deserve to be re-elected. And I think this issue is exactly what he should be judged on."

Unfortunately for Mrs Merkel, the speech was hardly reported in the German media. It was overshadowed by Mr Stoiber's remarks.

Story from BBC NEWS:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/pr/fr/-/1/hi/world/europe/4149792.stm

Published: 2005/08/13 20:45:38 GMT

© BBC MMV
______________________________________________________


Germany Attacks US on Iran Threat

German Chancellor Gerhard Schroeder has warned the US to back away from the possibility of military action against Iran over its nuclear programme.

His comments come a day after President Bush reiterated that force remained an option but only as a last resort.

Iran has resumed what it says is a civilian nuclear research programme but which the West fears could be used to develop nuclear arms.

Germany, France and the UK have led efforts to end the crisis peacefully.

Mr Schroeder's rejection of force came at the official launch of his party's election campaign.

The BBC's Ray Furlong - reporting from Hanover - says there was an echo of his last election campaign three years ago, when his steadfast opposition to the use of force against Iraq helped get him re-elected.

Applause

Mr Schroeder directly challenged Mr Bush's comment that "all options are on the table" over the Iran crisis.

"Let's take the military option off the table. We have seen it doesn't work," Mr Schroeder told Social Democrats at the rally in Hanover, to rapturous applause from the crowd.

Mr Schroeder said it remained important that Iran did not gain atomic weapons, and a strong negotiating position was important.

"The Europeans and the Americans are united in this goal," he said. "Up to now we were also united in the way to pursue this."

Mr Schroeder reiterates his views in an interview to be published Sunday in the German weekly Bild am Sonntag, labelling military action "extremely dangerous".

"This is why I can with certainty exclude any participation by the German government under my direction," Mr Schroeder tells the paper.

Mr Schroeder was among Europe's sternest critics of the Iraq war, causing a bitter rift with the US which poisoned relations between the two countries.

His opposition, in tandem with that President Jacques Chirac's France, led to US defence secretary Donald Rumsfeld's stinging attack on "old Europe".

The UN's atomic watchdog, the International Atomic Energy Agency, backed a resolution this week expressing "serious concern" at the resumption of the nuclear programme, and demanding it be halted again at once.

Mr Bush's comments about the military option came in an interview on Israeli TV.

The BBC's Jonathan Beale in Washington says the president wants to send a clear warning to Tehran, although in reality the US already has its hands full in neighbouring Iraq.

Mr Schroeder is lagging well behind his conservative rivals in the German election campaign, but has been narrowing the gap in recent days.

In the 2002 poll, he came from behind to snatch victory after anti-Iraq war feeling - and an outbreak of serious flooding in Germany - helped him attract last-minute support.



NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE
Mined uranium ore is purified and reconstituted into solid form known as yellowcake
Yellowcake is converted into a gas by heating it to about 64C (147F)
Gas is fed through centrifuges, where its isotopes separate and process is repeated until uranium is enriched
Low-level enriched uranium is used for nuclear fuel
Highly enriched uranium can be used in nuclear weapons



Story from BBC NEWS:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/pr/fr/-/1/hi/world/middle_east/4149090.stm

Published: 2005/08/13 16:19:43 GMT

© BBC MMV





1 Comments:

Anonymous Marcel vom Parteibuch said...

For me it looks a bit like, that the US administration never thinks about been hit back.

Nobody thinks about, how the world would look like, if the US destroys a nuclear poswer plant in Iran and Iran manages to destroy a nuclear power plant next day in the US.

What then: a nuclear war?

6:33 am  

Post a Comment

<< Home